Cascioli's "debut" Extraordinary pianist and composer indifferent to the rules of the avant-garde
"The piece is understandable. It is not my main
intention to make it difficult for the listener with abstruse and difficult
music, because the timing don't seem right to me. There is already an
incredible gap between the composer and the listener. To stop each one going
ahead of his own accord, it is necessary for our contemporary music to find a
public who wants to follow it".
"I hope that the time has finally come where
every composer can write what they feel, without having to ask themselves: can
I do this or can't I? Those who write music nowadays ask themselves too many of
these questions, they eliminate one passage because it is similar to another
composer's, they avoid writing tonal music and well defined rhythms. Basically,
what is known as avant garde
is nothing but an infinite series of rules and, as far as I am concerned, does
not help us much. I would like all experiences of avant
garde to be presented together with the music of the
past. Instead it happens that, attracted by novelty, we automatically get rid
of what there was before. Yet everything can be integrated sensibly, like in a
language where we don't get rid of a word just because we have learnt a better
one. I don't see why we need to replace everything. Only if we manage to blend
and use all music, from the past and the present, with all the experiences we
have, will we be able to lay the foundations on which people can find a common
ground, the understandable quality in a musical piece. And I'm also referring
to the use of tonality". "That's true, I have always chosen lesser
performed pieces. It all started with the Umberto Micheli Contest in Milan which had quite an interesting
programme, based on music from the twentieth century and on the most unusual
things by Beethoven, such as Fantasia for 77. I began my career as pianist
playing this repertoire on tour. Even for my first recordings, I had to unearth
what was less well known. Only now have I started to tackle famous pieces, but
I believe that they should be presented in a way which has something different
to say compared with those which have already been heard, otherwise I don't see
the use in constantly offering the same music again and again, in exactly the
same way. The interesting part of listening should be the novelty, the
difference, the amazement. It is the unknown which constantly attracts us.
Instead, too many critics believe that people don't enjoy themselves if they
don't hear the same things played with the exact same interpretation they
expect to hear. If we go down this route, there is no future for music.
However, I know too well how often it happens in a concert that the public puts
up resistance to a conductor who changes the tempo of a passage or makes a
certain phrasing different. This is a problem, especially if we consider the
beginning of the twentieth century when the interpretations and the interpreters
varied greatly from one another: there was Furtwangler
and Toscanini with their opposing visions of music.
Today it is all the same. There are, it's true to say, different personalities
but one feels that they belong to this age of total unification". "I am known as a pianist, but right from when I
was really young I nurtured an interest mainly in composing. I listened to many
classical music records which I had at home and this gave me the desire to
write. Curiosity led me to study an instrument and not composition
straightaway. At eight years of age, I began to study the piano seriously. I
had learnt the basics from people in my family who more or less knew the
instrument. I studied in Turin first of all and then, at about age twelve, came
the turning point when I went to the Imola Academy
and I met the maestro Franco Scala, my only real
teacher. I studied with him for a long time. In '94, I made my debut almost for
a laugh trying to participate in the Umberto Micheli Contest in Milan, and it went well. From there on
began my real career as a pianist, there were lots of concerts and recordings
up for grabs, and I hope it carries on".
"I have made attempts, I presented small pieces
in Ancona in 2000, but I don't consider myself to be
an expert in this field at all. However, having studied electronic music at the
conservatory of Milan, I think it is of course interesting to develop the sound
effects made possible by computer. I am convinced that the computer and
electronic music are the best ways to produce those sound effects which are
also sought in normal music, with normal acoustic instruments, orchestras or
pianos. Writing a theme or a development for a genre of electronic music is
extremely complex and almost impossible. Instead, making sound bands, producing
effects, strange or previously unheard sounds is part of the very nature of the
computer and, therefore, of electronic music. Vice versa, producing effects with
instruments often requires strange techniques. Violinists, for example, have to
use harmonic bows behind the bridge, pizzicato behind the bridge, untuning, bow with wood, and double or triple notes to
produce unusual sounds. They are extremely difficult techniques for brilliant
performers and the result does not always match the effort. For this reason I
never put effects in my symphonies and chamber music as an end to themselves. I
prefer to follow the example of Edgard Vārese who in a symphony orchestra piece such as Desert
put the instruments that make the music first and then a piece of
electronic music, followed by the orchestra again and then a tape of electronic
music followed again by the orchestra. Perhaps I'm wrong, but the instruments
used normally to fit the criteria of electronic music have their limits". "I have gained enough experience as a pianist.
Conducting orchestras and composing are still as yet unexplored territories.
Even though I have always written music without ever stopping since I began to
study music, composing requires a lot of practice. To present a symphony or a
sonata to the public you really need to have tried a lot of things. Composing
is always an interesting field to explore, constantly producing something new.
Conducting orchestras entertains me and fascinates me a great deal, I would
like to be able to get as much experience as possible and continue. Obviously I
don't want to give up the piano as it is an instrument I like a lot. I would
perhaps like to see my engagements as a conductor increase so that I could
perhaps even conduct my own music". "I have asked for 4 or 5 rehearsals, but I
wouldn't want to take time away from Mozart and Beethoven so I do as God
commands. Unfortunately, it is normal for a new piece to take longer, also
because until I hear it as I had in mind it will probably irritate me". |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||